|
Post by Mitch on Nov 4, 2007 17:10:24 GMT
Int the case of mitch vs world, May the court strike evidence portaining to mitch's bad humour vs world, as the two are completely seperate cases.
|
|
|
Post by Stubbs on Nov 4, 2007 18:27:13 GMT
The defense does make a good point as we can see from precedent set in the case of Ash vs World and Ash's violent ways vs The S.T.U.B.B.S. the violence was strikken from the World case and used as evidence for the S.T.U.B.B.S Case.
Therfore Mitch vs world shall be split into Mitch Vs World and mitch's bad humour vs taxi for one
Case ongoing...
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 4, 2007 18:29:10 GMT
that simply isn't true, your bad humour deffinatly needs consideration in the whole mitch v world, probably several days consideration it is a long topic
|
|
|
Post by Stubbs on Nov 4, 2007 18:41:25 GMT
president is already in place, Although you could argue that The Ash vs world was such a big crime that it had to be broken up into more manageable offenses as to avoid the death penalty to her and all she knows (the S.T.U.B.B.S included) and therfor has no referance on the mitch vs world wich,m to be honest their's belay a case. Hes such a loverbal guy you can't help but like.
The S.T.U.B.B.S. would like to expand his realm of authoraty to include the rest of the committee, There are many attrosotys that must be brought to justices under a case (proveical) Jungle vs World (including London)
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 4, 2007 21:05:16 GMT
*smiles and nods*
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 5, 2007 10:41:12 GMT
i think the legalise is too much for ash's little brain, i have never been secretary you can't get me too
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 5, 2007 10:45:30 GMT
we will see...
|
|
|
Post by Stubbs on Nov 5, 2007 13:37:45 GMT
It's ok, Ash Pulled the non comprehension at her trial and it failed, we drew her prity pictures to make her understand.
Jungle, it's only a mater of time until your mine!
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 5, 2007 15:05:54 GMT
oh come on then stubbs, you know you want me.
|
|
|
Post by Mitch on Nov 5, 2007 15:27:57 GMT
Hes such a loverbal guy you can't help but like. You see ash, this is where you are going wrong: You buy stubbs lots and lots and lots of beer FIRST, and THEN you are free to tell embarressing stories about him and subject him to general mockery and abuse! Then again, I'm not sure if theres enough beer in the world to numb trhe pain of a groinal kick...
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 5, 2007 18:22:38 GMT
well u may hav enough money after the money jungle paid to clear his debts, but i dont think the union pays that much per hour...
|
|
|
Post by webspider on Nov 5, 2007 20:19:13 GMT
May I submit myself as proof of the results of mitch's, ross's and ash's corruption against sweet innocent people ( ) in the ongoing trails. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 5, 2007 20:24:58 GMT
you may and we will all gasp in horror at the gahstly nature of it (and the number of scars too)
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 5, 2007 22:21:28 GMT
i wud never cause scars, must have been the boys!
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 5, 2007 22:24:33 GMT
he frequently complains about carpet burns which i am sure were you
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 5, 2007 22:35:08 GMT
naver...
|
|
|
Post by Stubbs on Nov 6, 2007 1:46:30 GMT
The S.T.U.B.B.S. commends the bravery of all men such a Phil for taking the chance and seeing these terrible people brought to justice.
heres your reward £50,000 as promised, I hope you enjoy your new life in Miami
The S.T.U.B.B.S. would also like to say that it will offer imunity to anyone *cough* *mitch* *cough* who helps bering down, what the papers are calling, The greatest danger since Gemmer, Amy and Anna!
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 6, 2007 11:04:17 GMT
bravery, he sat on the floor and got carpet burns, then cried like a baby, thats not bravery!
No immunity you offer can protect mitch...
|
|
|
Post by Mitch on Nov 6, 2007 15:09:26 GMT
So... stubbs... what kind of protection could you offer?
See? Death threats! Evidence!!! EVIDENCE!!!! Condemned by your own mouth!!!
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 6, 2007 15:23:17 GMT
i have been informed the defendant is preparing a case, it looks very weak against the overwhelming evidence of the prosicution
|
|
|
Post by Mitch on Nov 6, 2007 15:34:05 GMT
Unless its a case of beer for the judge
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 6, 2007 15:49:46 GMT
mental note: beer... The defendants case is very strong, as she has a very strong legal team.
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 6, 2007 16:41:15 GMT
where have you magiced them up from, i am sure the STUBBS is a fair and uncoruptable judge. I wonder how much beer is required to overcome the loss of ability to procreate
|
|
|
Post by webspider on Nov 6, 2007 18:14:16 GMT
For the record i didn't cry like a bady, and thanks for the money Stubbs it will go to a good cause, hehe ;D
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 6, 2007 20:00:07 GMT
Thats whet he says now, see unreliable evidence! Im sure my fellow nonviolent females in the club would choose the right side
|
|
|
Post by webspider on Nov 6, 2007 21:10:19 GMT
You mean there's actually a non-violent female out there
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 6, 2007 21:33:32 GMT
of course, the club is full of them, see your witness is so confused, unreliable!
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 6, 2007 21:55:26 GMT
non violent female??? hmm i am not sure such a beast exists
|
|
|
Post by igglybabe on Nov 6, 2007 21:59:24 GMT
i am the perfect example, as is eve or lisa...
|
|
|
Post by Jungle on Nov 6, 2007 22:04:13 GMT
...of a violent female,
yes yes but the question remains are there non violent females out there, all applicants for position of non violent female to apply in person to the house of jungle for complete examination.
|
|